Salon

 

R E C E N T L Y

The GOP goes "liberal"
(11/17/98)

Hypocrite of the House
(10/05/98)

What goes around, comes around
(09/21/98)

One who mattered
(09/08/98)

Here comes Newt!
(08/24/98)

- - - - - - - - - -

About Joe Conason
Archive

- - - - - - - - - -

C O L U M N I S T S

The Reluctant Capitalist
By Heather Chaplin
Exxon-Mobil: Bigger than Monica?
(12/04/98)

Unspun
By Steve Erickson
Democracy on life support
(11/25/98)

Right On!
By David Horowitz
Fascism by another name
(12/07/98)

Mr. Blue
By Garrison Keillor
What if the shame of whoring around becomes as intoxicating as the clandestine sex?
(11/17/98)

Word by Word
By Anne Lamott
Thanksgiving
(11/25/98)

Media Circus
By Susan Lehman
Ahoy, mates!
(12/04/98)

On Television
By Joyce Millman
Fufighter
(12/07/98)

Ask Camille
By Camille Paglia
Ken Starr's strange sexual persona
(11/25/98)

Under the Covers
By James Poniewozik
Liberté, Egalité, Versace!
(12/08/98)

Let's Get This Straight
By Scott Rosenberg
The birth of an Internet network?
(12/01/98)

Home Movies
By Charles Taylor
Book worm
(11/30/98)

Second Thoughts
By Sallie Tisdale
Twinns
(12/03/98)

 

Salon Columnists

 

- - - - - - - - - -

 

J O E+C O N A S O N + ++ L E F T + H O O K | PAGE 2 OF 2

 

 

DeLay has long been among the top fund-raisers in the House, and one of its most obdurate opponents of campaign finance reform. His surprise election as whip in 1994 -- over a candidate strongly preferred by Gingrich -- was widely credited to the millions of dollars he had directed to victorious Republican challengers the year before. The grateful freshman conservatives returned the favor by supporting his elevation into the leadership. And when DeLay called up to demand a certain vote in his role as whip, those same new members understood that to displease him would mean forfeiting the campaign funds that would ensure their reelection.

Some notion of DeLay's power may be gleaned from a single statistic from this year's election data: By Nov. 3, the top 50 corporate PACs alone had given more than $36 million to Republican candidates, or an average of nearly $160,000 to each of the 228 GOP members. Now keep in mind that the "Hammer" continuously monitors the donations of the top 400 PACs -- because that is exactly what DeLay's colleagues have in mind when he asks how they intend to vote on impeachment.

When he's not pushing impeachment, the exacting Texan's organizational skills are marshaled behind other elements of the far-right-wing political agenda. On both economic and social issues, DeLay fervently espouses the fringe ideology that threatens to drive moderates out of the Republican Party altogether. If he could, DeLay would abolish the minimum wage and most other regulation of business; he nurtures a particular hatred of environmental laws, which hobbled his Houston pest-control company. When he invites corporate lobbyists to write legislation affecting their companies, he is implementing his beliefs while soliciting donations.

Having undergone a personal religious awakening after he entered Congress in 1985, DeLay also maintains close ties to national leaders of the religious right. To appease their demand for strong measures against abortion, gay rights and other secular sins, he established last year a special caucus known as the Values Action Team. (The team's Web page on DeLay's site links directly to James Dobson's Focus on the Family and to Gary Bauer's Family Research Council.) Not long ago, DeLay summed up with typical bluntness his own "pro-family" interpretation of the First Amendment. "There is," he said, "no separation of church and state in that statement."

Unsurprisingly then, DeLay's view of impeachment has faithfully reflected the fanatical hatred of the president promoted by the religious right ever since the Rev. Jerry Falwell began hawking the "Clinton Chronicles" videotapes in 1994. Like Falwell, Dobson, Bauer and Pat Robertson, DeLay regards the removal of Clinton to be his duty as a pious Christian. Back in September, he publicly vowed to block any attempt to vote on censure as a substitute for impeachment -- and he now stands as the chief obstacle to compromise.

That implacable attitude, combined with the corporate money to back it up, explains why a dozen or so Republicans who seemed certain to reject impeachment just a few weeks ago may vote instead to prolong the present crisis. They probably fear the Hammer more than the wrath of their own exasperated constituents.
SALON | Dec. 8, 1998

Joe Conason's Left Hook column appears every other Tuesday in Salon.

Bookmark http://www.salonmagazine.com/col/cona/

 
 
 
 
Salon | Search | Archives | Contact Us | Table Talk | Ad Info

Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus

Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.