|
|
R E C E N T L Y
The decline of pop culture Ken Starr: The illicit child of Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill Male troubles: Bill Clinton, Matt Drudge and Mark McGwire I serviced the president and all I got was this lousy Martha's Vineyard souvenir
Swinging with the sodomites
- - - - - - - - - -
A L S O
About Camille Paglia
- - - - - - - - - -
C O L U M N I S T S
Sexpert Opinion The Reluctant Capitalist Left Hook Right On! Mr. Blue On Television Under the Covers Let's Get This Straight Home Movies Second Thoughts - - - - - - - - - -
|
A S K_C A M I L L E +|+ C A M I L L E+P A G L I A
Dear Camille:
Are the Clintons swingers? They seemed to miss much of the fun of the '60s and '70s, and perhaps are trying to catch up. Just seems like a plausible explanation for this whole damn mess.
James
Dear James:
The Clintons are tunnel-vision workaholics with a Messiah complex. No matter
how they trim, plot, spin and screw up, they believe in their overwhelming
virtue and others' diabolic envy. Yet it's the Clintons themselves who take
the serpent's pleasure in outwitting others through manipulation and
distortion of language.
Bill longs to swing, but he's got the guilts, so he has to pay and pay at the
office. His solicitous secretary must shoehorn gals into his datebook, while a
phalanx of guards, valets and other uniformed nannies minds the doors and
cleans up the piddle puddle.
Hillary's a Protestant nun who found her melancholic cavalier in Vincent
Foster (cf. the impractical, shilly-shallying Ashley Wilkes), but who prefers
men-as-children -- a condescending habit of mind she got en famille when she played lady of the manor to her two foot-shuffling, forelock-tugging younger brothers (serfs who trembled before
paternal tyranny).
Psychologically, Hillary's too tough a nut for most of the media to crack. I
stand by my early Salon portrait of her as "the first drag queen" (which the New Republic asked me to expand into a March 4, 1996,
cover story that made Clinton sycophants like Linda Bloodworth-Thomason foam
at the mouth). Hillary's unresolved, internal gender wars have brought a herd
of stampeding hippopotami (Tripp, Lewinsky, et al.) upon us. We keep trying to
turn the channel, but this ashcan-school situation-comedy is stuck in reruns.
Dear Camille:
I am a young white man who has recently moved to an African-American
ghetto in a large Northern city. I consider myself uncommonly
unprejudiced. Nevertheless, I understand why I'm virtually the only
white person here: It's like living in a third world country, with all
its chaos and danger and dirt. I appreciate the soulful,
pre-capitalistic orientation of black culture, and am very ambivalent
about the prospect of an anal, Northern European monoculture, but I
wonder if the assimilation of all African-Americans into the mainstream
might be best for all of us. What do you think?
Brendan Farrell
Inner-city African-Americans inhabit the same tenement culture as immigrant
Jews or Italians did in the late-19th and early-20th centuries,
when Northeastern and Midwestern cities were sharply divided into teeming
ethnic strongholds. Economic advancement inevitably brings dilution of
ethnicity. By definition, assimilation means absorption. Middle-class
African-Americans are currently debating, in many genres and forums, how much
of their historical Southern agrarian identity to retain or discard.
In the last half century, older American inner cities gradually became scenes
of Beirut-like devastation. The primary reason for this was the shift of the
national economy from industry to the white-collar service sector. Urban
blacks no longer have reliable access to factory jobs (as did my immigrant
grandfather, for example, who was a shoeworker).
Chester, Pa., located on the Delaware River not far from where I live outside
Philadelphia, was once a thriving city based on shipbuilding, which further
expanded during World War II. It is now a virtual ghost town, riven by decay
and crime. Because the business tax base has shrunk, the school system for
the city's overwhelmingly black children is grossly underfunded. Only the
state or federal government would have the resources to help Chester.
After the Great Migration earlier in this century, when millions of blacks
moved north to escape persecution and poverty, the social classes
intermingled. In the immensely creative Harlem of the 1920s and 1930s, for
example, professional, middle-class blacks lived near manual laborers, partly
because property sales to blacks or Jews were officially or covertly
prohibited in "restricted" communities outside the city.
Decade by decade since segregation was banned, middle-class blacks have
understandably fled the crime-filled inner cities to make better lives for
their families, leaving the working-class, welfare-dependent "third world"
that you describe. The U.S. government's hypocritical attitude toward drugs
(bourgeois Prozac and Ritalin are fine; heroin and crack are not) has created
a social catastrophe, destabilizing urban economies by making a joke out of
the work ethic: Why put in 40 hours a week at minimum wage when you can score
gold jewelry and a luxury car with a few wholesale drug deals?
Furthermore, the Washington political establishment, for its own preening
self-image, is addicted to dispensing foreign aid, exporting billions of our tax
dollars that should be salvaging the inner cities. No American city street
anywhere should be permanently strewn with trash and broken glass. Too many
areas of Philadelphia on the periphery of booming Center City (with its
gleaming, green skyscrapers) are filled with block after block of abandoned,
fire-hazard buildings that should long ago have been torn down and turned into
public parks.
Social justice demands a Marshall Plan for America's inner cities. I'm sick to
death of reading about the fractious Balkans, which have been imploding for a
thousand damned years. We have problems of equal or greater importance at
home. The bottom line must be decent education, housing, sanitation and
medical care for the poor.
There is enormous opportunity here for young, idealistic politicians of both
parties to design master plans for urban economic redevelopment. But it would
require leftists to acknowledge the fertility of capitalism, and it would
require conservatives to recognize that it is government's duty to provide a
safety net for every citizen.
N E X T_P A G E | Can a penis-adoring man find domestic bliss with a woman? |
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.