|
|
T A B L E__T A L K What's it worth to make a buck? Tell your horror stories and read
those of others in Table
Talk
R E C E N T L Y
In defense of James Cramer Big apple pickpocket Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome ... the Grateful Capitalists! Epidemic of extravagance Van Gogh Inc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Browse the - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|
Singing the union blues
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Confession: I grow misty eyed watching any movie that contains a group of people coming together and throwing off their bonds of oppression. I have to rent these movies alone so I can sit in the dark and blow my nose and weep over the beauty of people working to better their lives. It's a fault, I know, probably the result of too much Pete Seeger and Woody Guthrie as a child, but what can I do about it now? This debilitating weakness has already hardened into a full-blown dedication to unionization. The mystery for me has always been why Americans aren't more dedicated to organized labor, why they aren't more interested in the power of solidarity between working people. You may roll your eyes, but "all for one and one for all," and "an injury to one is an injury to all," are intensely practical expressions when you examine the principles behind them. Soldiers understand the concept, gang members do, even Europeans. How come to Americans, they just seem corny, naive, distasteful even? Is it because "working people" implies something sweaty from which most Americans want to be disassociated? Is it the result of a snow job by corporate interests, convincing us that joining a union means a loss of freedom? Is solidarity simply passé? Organized labor has certainly done its share in turning people off. Mob connections, for example, are never good for PR, unless you're in the mob, which most American aren't. Neither is small-scale corruption. Yes, like any movement, organized labor has its problems. In addition, it failed to maintain organizing efforts after reaching its peak membership years in the 1950s, and in the 1970s and 1980s, it let important links with community and other social groups disintegrate. Many people don't know it ever had them: that, for example, the 1963 March on Washington, when Martin Luther King Jr. made his "I Have a Dream" speech, was cosponsored by the United Auto Workers. It was called the "March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom."
N E X T+P A G E | Encouraging poll numbers for the labor movement | ||
Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus
Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.