Navigation Salon Salon News email print
Arts & Entertainment
Books
Comics
Health & Body
Media
Mothers Who Think
.News
People
Politics2000
Technology
- Free Software
Travel & Food
_______
Columnists

 

Current
Wire Stories

Click here to read the latest stories from the wires.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Also Today

For a full list of today's Salon News stories, go to the News home page.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Search Salon


  
Advanced Search  |  Help

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Recently in Salon News

Hungary's gentleman bandit
In a country rife with corruption, a chivalrous, whiskey-drinking criminal has captured the popular imagination.

By Adam LeBor
[08/17/99]

How much mourning is enough?
As Columbine High goes back to school, parents and students wrestle with how to remember while also trying to move on.

By Dave Cullen
[08/17/99]

How not to stifle a racist
The California Supreme Court may have been well-meaning when it banned racial slurs in a hostile workplace, but in the process it damaged the Bill of Rights.

By Debra Dickerson
[08/16/99]

Iowa GOP Straw Poll results
Results from Iowa


[08/16/99]

They feed horses, don't they?
Bush and Forbes finished one-two in the Iowa straw poll, and why not? They paid for this circus, after all.

By Jake Tapper
[08/16/99]

Complete archives for News

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - -




The great Arkansas railway mystery
Twelve years ago, two teenagers were murdered on a rural railroad track. Right-wing conspiracy theorists who blamed then-Gov. Bill Clinton for the killings have now lost a $600,000 libel suit in the case.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Suzi Parker

August 18, 1999 | LITTLE ROCK, Ark. -- Wild rumors have swirled through Arkansas for the past 12 years about the mysterious deaths of two teenagers, 17-year-old Kevin Ives and 16-year-old Don Henry, on the railroad tracks in rural Saline County in 1987.

Initially, the boys' deaths were said to be due to a marijuana-induced sleep. Later, a grand jury overturned that finding, and out-of-state pathologists determined that the deaths were in fact homicides.

At that point, controversial film producer Patrick Matrisciana entered the scene. Matrisciana, from Hemet, Calif., is best-known for his 1994 conspiratorial "documentary" "The Clinton Chronicles," a mail-order film that's an underground bestseller on the Clinton-hating extreme right.

Matrisciana's resulting 1996 film on the railroad mystery, "Obstruction of Justice: The Mena Connection," alleged that the teenagers were killed after they accidentally witnessed a clandestine drug deal in which top state officials were involved.

The film asserted that the boys' bodies were laid on the tracks so a train would run over them and destroy evidence. It further alleged that two veteran sheriff's deputies, Jay Campbell and Kirk Lane, were the boys' murderers, and that the crimes were covered up with the help of state and federal prosecutors and -- naturally -- then-Gov. Bill Clinton.

But last week, an Arkansas jury ruled that Matrisciana's film had demonstrated "reckless disregard for the truth" and had libeled deputies Campbell and Lane. The jury awarded the two sheriff's officers nearly $600,000 in damages.

In so doing, the jury rejected Matrisciana's contention throughout the trial that he could not be held responsible for any libel because he gave full editorial control over the film to Linda Ives, the mother of one of the boys, and Jean Duffy, a former Saline County deputy prosecutor.

The unsolved mystery of the train deaths has attracted national media interest over the years, including the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. In 1996, the Journal's Micah Morrison wrote "The Lonely Crusade of Linda Ives," an article flowing with conspiracy theories.

"It adds some credibility to a story when something as widely known as the Wall Street Journal prints the story," noted Jay Campbell, one of the deputies vindicated by the libel ruling.

The conservative Arkansas Democrat-Gazette heavily criticized the Journal at the time for its inability to decipher fiction from truth. "There is apparently no old story, discredited piece of gossip or wild rumor that the Journal won't take seriously so long as its subject is Arkansas," the paper editorialized.

(The Journal's Morrison did not return calls for this story.)

Meanwhile, the recent libel trial brought out some new evidence about who may have been behind the boys' deaths, including indications that they may indeed have been killed for witnessing a drug deal of some sort.

. Next page | The real suspects in the case are already in jail



 

Salon | Search | Archives | Contact Us | Table Talk | Ad Info

Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Life | News | People
Politics | Sex | Tech & Business | Audio
The Free Software Project | The Movie Page
Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus

Copyright © 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.